Assessment 1: Dashboard Metrics Evaluation Name Capella University FPX 6004 Professor’s Name December, 2023

Dashboard Metrics Evaluation

In evaluating the diabetic patient dashboard at Mercy Medical Center, a critical examination of key performance metrics is paramount to gauge its efficacy against established standards. Globally, healthcare organizations are steadfastly engaged in quality and safety initiatives, aligning their programs with national, state, and federal benchmarks. The adherence to stringent governmental standards, notably the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), is imperative in the pursuit of healthcare goals. By scrutinizing the dashboard’s strengths and weaknesses, this study aims to contribute insights that go beyond mere compliance, fostering an environment that not only meets regulatory requirements but also enhances the overall quality of care provided to diabetic patients (Twohig et al., 2019). The comprehensive assessment will provide valuable data to refine and optimize the dashboard, ensuring it aligns seamlessly with healthcare best practices and contributes meaningfully to patient outcomes. Also visit our site NURS FPX 8030 Assessment 2

Evaluation of Dashboard Metrics

Analyzing data from Mercy Medical Center in Shakopee City reveals a total of 36,192 individuals, including 17,957 males and 18,235 females. The city has a diverse cultural population, with 28,537 identified as whites, 2,890 as Hispanics, and 433 as Indians. The medical center, known for its good reputation, has a dedicated workforce of 433 highly experienced professionals who have conducted 4,627 surgeries, with a consistent influx of patient visits. Despite these positive aspects, concerns arise when examining the dashboard metrics against benchmarks. Notably, there’s a significant decline in HgbA1c exams over observed quarters, a crucial measure for monitoring diabetes control. This consistent underperformance raises concerns about the quality of care, as documented in 2019 and 2020. Additionally, the low rate of foot exams, important in preventing diabetes-related complications, is a significant cause for worry. While eye exams show some fluctuation, they remain relatively higher compared to foot and HgbA1c exams. The dataset lacks sufficient information to comprehensively address the performance of new diabetes patients, posing a challenge in evaluating metrics.

Fluctuations in Dashboard Metrics

Concerns arise from Mercy Medical Center’s dashboard data, specifically regarding fluctuations in two vital metrics: foot examinations and HgbA1c tests. These metrics are crucial for evaluating diabetes levels in patients and preventing its escalation through timely healthcare services (Seyedi et al., 2023). Notably, the National Healthcare Quality and Disparity Report (NHQDR) sets a benchmark of 84% for foot examinations. However, in 2019 and 2020, only 40.8% and 41.3% of 563 patients underwent this examination, falling well below the national benchmark. Similarly, the HgbA1c test, with a national benchmark of 79.5% in 2020, contrasts sharply with Mercy Medical Center’s performance at 48.3%. These disparities are significant, given the influence of local, state, and federal healthcare policies like the California Diabetes Prevention and Control Program (CDPCP) and Merit-based Incentive Payment (MIPS), which establish benchmarks for diabetes management. It is crucial to address gaps in information, such as data accuracy and metric relevance, to prevent misinterpretations that may hinder effective healthcare practices.

Addressing Gaps in Dashboard Benchmark Evaluation

Ensuring a meaningful evaluation of benchmarks requires addressing gaps in information that could affect the accuracy and relevance of metrics. These gaps involve making results comparable, choosing appropriate benchmarks, and understanding how tests impact health outcomes (Fareed et al., 2021). Filling these gaps is vital to prevent misleading assessments of diabetes test performance and improve overall healthcare practices. Further research and consultation with relevant regulatory bodies are crucial to ensure a thorough and accurate evaluation of the organization’s performance. By taking these steps, we can enhance the reliability of benchmark assessments and contribute to more effective healthcare practices that better serve the needs of patients.