NURS 4030 Assessment 2 Instructions Determining The Credibility Of Evidence And Resources

NURS 4030 Assessment 2 Instructions Determining The Credibility Of Evidence And Resources

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgment skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, health care systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

Scenario

For this assessment, you may choose from the following options as the context for the quality or safety issue or chosen diagnosis for researching and completing this assessment:

• The specific diagnosis you identified in your previous assessment.
• The simulation Vila Health: Determining the Credibility of Evidence.

A personal practice experience in which a sentinel event occurred. The purpose of this analysis is to better understand what constitutes credibility of journal articles as well as websites. The role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in incorporating evidence-based research continues to grow in clinical practice. 

As quality improvement (QI) measures to reduce safety risks continue to be emphasized, the need for evidence-based models and evidence-based templates is growing.

This type of systematic approach to incorporating evidence-based findings allows nurses to make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence. When the most up-to-date evidence-based findings are utilized, patient-centered care improves outcomes and enhances the patient experience.

For this:

• Explain the criteria that should be used when determining the credibility of journal articles as well as websites.
• Support your explanations with references to the literature or research articles that describe criteria that should be used to determine credibility.
• Your identification and determination of credibility should be done within the context of your chosen scenario for this assessment. 

For example, if you choose to use the provided Vila Health scenario, your initial identification of resources should be of resources that will best help address the presented issue. However, if you are locating resources to help provide evidence-based care for the diagnosis you identified in the first assessment, you may want to begin your literature and evidence search from the databases that identified. 

Any of the three scenario options are acceptable. So, pick the one that most interests you. Be sure to address the following in this which correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you will know what is needed for a distinguished score.

• Describe a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis, that could benefit from an evidence-based approach.
• Explain criteria that should be considered when determining credibility of resources such as journal articles and websites.
• Analyze the credibility and relevance of evidence and resources within the context of a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
• This is where you are selecting the specific resources to help address the issue in your chosen scenario.
• Explain the importance of incorporating credible evidence into an EBP model used to address a quality or safety issue, or a chosen diagnosis.
• Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

Determining The Credibility Of Evidence And Resources Sample Paper

The third step of evidence-based practice involves critical appraisal of the sources of the evidence. This ensures their worthiness for application in practice. This worthiness can alternatively be assessed by assessing the credibility of these sources. The credibility of the evidence sources implies that the evidence can be related well to reality and that the truth in the findings can be demonstrated. In the previous step, a diagnosis of acute pneumonia was selected for evidence-based search on the diagnosis process. In this paper, the credibility of the sources that would be assembled will be elaborated and the criteria explained.

Description of the Diagnosis

The new nurse had difficulty in the process of coming up with a diagnosis in a patient with acute chest pain and productive cough. The guidelines for making clinical diagnoses have been improved with time and vary with the setting of clinical practice. The new nurse would benefit from evidence-based practice to establish the best criterion to apply in the diagnostic process. Four databases were identified for the literature search: PubMed, Cochrane Library, google scholar, CINAHL, and PsycINFO.

Literature Search

The literature search wa

Order Now